Global Warming Is A Total Scam

COMMENTS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING

By John Coleman

it is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990’s to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I suspect you might like to say to me, “John, look the research that supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people with PH D’s in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other scientists with PH D’s. They have to know a lot more about it than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created an strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control global warming is underway that will sky rocket temperatures, destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.

Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a culture and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very different. I know this group well. My father and my older brother were both PHD-University types. I was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PHD in Meteorology and become a research scientist, more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are environmentalists above all else.

And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come flooding their way.

So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90’s they were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like minded PHD colleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without question.

There were a few who didn’t fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental elitists berated them brushed their studies aside.

I have learned since the Ice Age is coming scare in the 1970’s to always be a skeptic about research. In the case of the global warming scam, I didn’t accept media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science.

I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PH D’s, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped.

The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway.

I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.

17 Responses to 'Global Warming Is A Total Scam'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Global Warming Is A Total Scam'.

  1. science said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 6:54 am

    risk management. ever heard of that.

    your level of douchebaggery is out of control.

  2. Innomado said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 7:37 am

    Ad Hominem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

    Attacking the character or motivations of those making claims that you disagree with may be valid when you are trying to motivate others to look more closely and with a more critical eye at said claims. That does not mean that those attacks, in any way, constitute a valid argument against the opposing party’s claim.

    If you want to convince other people that your position is correct then make a valid argument. You say that you have studied and consulted with experts, back it up. Produce the results of that investigation, justify why the experts you side with are more correct, argue relevant points, do more than make an empty unsupported claim.
    If you can’t do that then you’re just spouting bullshit, and most of us are neck deep in it already. We don’t need more people adding to the pile.

  3. bmf said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 7:44 am

    That is the worst bullshit I have ever heard.


  4. on February 22nd, 2008 at 7:50 am

    YOU ARE F-ING KIDDING ME!!!! THATS THE BIGGEST LOAD OF CRAP!!!!! I’D SUE YOU FOR THAT IF I COULD!

  5. Bart Heruth said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 7:51 am

    John….Thank You!….I do think that we can do a lot more to clean up planet earth however, I also remember the global cooling rap from a few years back and it seems to have returned …same song..different words.But you have to remember, Als making a LOT of money off from this one.May I link into this sight from my Fact or Fiction Page(in process)? …….Also it is -12 as I type this..global warming should get it up to + 8 tomorrow for the hi.


  6. on February 22nd, 2008 at 8:32 am

    Everything written here is true. GW is a scam. Gore’s movie is designed to further the investor value of his green investment company, nothing more. Gore is a clever rascal.

  7. johnissilly said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 9:46 am

    what a silly person you are john. Maybe you just feel bad that your dad and brother are smarter than you (both PhDs) and you are a stupid weatherman? Have you ever looked at the absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide? (do you know what an absorption spectrum is?) Please, go park your car in your garage, close the garage door, open your car windows, and turn the car on. Quickly you will realize what happens when you release a large amount of a toxic substance into a small volume.

  8. Ayn said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    So your claim is GW is a myth because the scientist want more money. Try backing it up with science instead of Ad Hominem attacks.

  9. Rigbee said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    Folks, when the guy who’s responsible for The Weather Channel talks about climate change, you should listen respectfully, then say, “Thank you, Mr. Coleman.”

    Thank you, Mr. Coleman.

  10. Wolf Potter said,

    on February 22nd, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    “Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario”

    This says it all. Just another conspiracy theory. The so called “climate skeptics” are either a bunch of semi-senile would-be scientists or have been bribed by the fossil fuel industry. Just take a look at Singer, Ball, Michaels, and all the other corrupt people who form the spearhead of the anti-GW faction. They are lying to the public.

  11. Liar said,

    on May 13th, 2008 at 1:55 am

    tell it to someone who believes you buddy, because no one cares.if you were even to give some small level of proof, i wouldn’t believe you. you’re just saying that gb is a scam. can you prove it? no. i agree with Ashleigh Skye Tyler. read her post to see what she said. amen sister!

  12. shep said,

    on June 6th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    Hi Liar – can you definitively prove I am wrong? Oh, wait can you prove you are right – No.

  13. emilyce said,

    on December 4th, 2008 at 5:46 am

    Not one person on the GW side has been able to substantiate it with hard data. johnissilly, what you are referring to in a parked car is carbon monoxide, genius. Absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide? Uh, you don’t even know what that is. Near the earth’s surface, the absorption peaks for water vapor partially overlap the absorption peaks for CO2, to say nothing of the atmosphere. Liar, listen to what you are saying. You don’t care if you have evidence to prove gb is a scam? What are you, a creationist? Certainly neither of you are scientists or engineers, and you should keep your political opinions to yourselves and leave the science to the real scientists.

  14. Phd_101 said,

    on January 10th, 2009 at 7:31 am

    In Basic language, if CO2 CAN NOT warm two cups of water to any noticeable temperature difference,.. how can “Carbon dioxide” Heat the Oceans of the world…?

    “The Little Experiment…” taking two bottles and filling them with equal parts of water. The one bottle I completely flooded with Co2 making in have an air volume of approx (92% Co2.
    The other bottle is just plain air from an air compressor, the air we breath consists of 0.03 percent Co2.
    heating up the bottles to the same temperatures. I took the read outs and both were the same. One read out with the Co2 should have been a higher temperature, according to what is the Co2 law… The other read out was read, after removing it from the heat. Same read-outs.
    No accelerant an any way co2… Nor heat retention..?

    The professor @ MIT of meteorology ,came up with theses theories, “to replace the argon gas in double pan widows, with CO2 if it retains heat so well”,.. if Co2 retains heat so well, than why not fill the Styrofoam types of installation that is used in house with Co2…

    Needed supplies…

    2 thermometers.
    1 paper funnel.
    3 2 liter empty soda bottles.
    11/2 cup vinegar
    3/4 cup baking soda
    2 large sphere balloons , just the large enough balloons that will slip over the top opening of a 2 liter plastic soda bottle.
    2 equal, identical in size thickness, 20 once cups.
    2 twist-up tie off’s.
    a large area that has full sun, and is free of debris that might cause shadows, will explain.

    You have your (3) bottles, fill one with the 1 and 1/2 cup of vinegar. Make a small funnel out of paper, and pour the backing soda into the bottle of vinegar. This will cause a chain reaction; the vinegar and baking soda mixed, bubbling up “making Co2″… Just like in elementary school, with the toy volcano’s. Immediately place the balloon over the mouth of the two liter bottle, capturing the Co2. Let the balloon fill up. You are now making your own CO2

    Let the bottle fill until there is no more Co2 to hold, and or risk of balloon ripping. Now use you tie/ twist tight the balloon. Fill the second 2 liter bottle with exactly 2 cups of water. Now once filled squeeze bottle expelling as much air as possible. Place the twist tied balloon that holds your Co2 over the bottle. squeezing the bottle flat, placing the balloon of Co2 over the bottle opening, and let the bottle fill up with the Co2 from the balloon. leave the balloon over the bottle, this will keep the Co2 form escaping, and will also keep anything else for getting inside. You now have your first controlled mini-environment #1 complete.

    Now follow the same steps with the third and final faze, only exception is filling the balloon with plan air, perhaps from a air compressor. You now have your first controlled mini-environment #2 complete. Once finished you will have your #2nd controlled mini-environment. Place the two controlled mini-environment in (full) sun light, say from 10:00am to 4:00pm. allow it to be exposed to it at least 4 to 6 hours to the suns light heating the controlled mini-environments . Now take off the balloons pour the water from the bottles into the cups. Place in your thermometers in each cup taking the waters temperatures of each controlled environment 1 and 2.

    Compare temp read outs… what are the temperatures.. Both read-outs came out to be the same temps…

    The only thing I did not add was sea-salt to produce salt water; but I do not think it would change the out-come? just need to confirm out-comes… Repeat results to become conclusive…

  15. Phd_101 said,

    on January 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    I usually do not not comment on blogs people can believe in what they want to in life, but once your crazy beliefs or “feelings” never any real debates affects the world than let the science prove you wrong. Have heard people say they have seen for themselves the ice falling, crashing into the ocean… Could it possible be that the ice has been falling for Millennia. If one were to have never seen nor-heard of Niagara Falls, and you were brought there than told the earth was flooding, would you not believe it…

    Global Warming scam, a Fraud, a religion of sorts.. A religion to those that believe we nasty people have caused this, and with this belief also having the ordasity to think we could fix it… Definitely a belief in something… With believing in any thing you have to have Faith correct. Yes, a faith that we peoples have caused this, being their apocalypse, not mine as with many others that look and study history, in correlation with science. Do not just take someone’s word for it, study for yourselves..even if those words come from someone considered creditable…

    A student of history, and history can prove that there is a natural accordance in climate change.. that this spike in temperature or lack of it in the oceans has happened before. Known as “The Big Chill / Little Ice Age…”

    I believe so much in the environment, and just can not sit by seeing this SCAM getting more and more attention. Allot of funds also being diverted to fix something that does not need fixing. Monies that could be used to educate people to recycle, be aware of waste, and to develop a car that is fisable along with liability. This would be wrong to plunge a hand into peoples wallets with the people of today having lost so much due to the greed of people. Those of us that want to see our monies used in a responsible way to truly clean, and help build a better world for a better tomorrow…

    I once believed in Global Warming too, the point of trying to find the cause of it all. Now I have hope that the peoples eyes will be opened to the truth of things.

  16. statetheobvious said,

    on January 11th, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    where is the disclaimer. are you asking to get sued?

  17. Saiko-M said,

    on February 19th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    I support John Coleman. I think that GW is a scam … We have not had this much snow in Norway for years …. The first snow ever to fall in Bagdad fell just some years ago… North-America has not had this much snow for 50 years. Are these signs of GW? Arktis is growing again, it’s getting bigger! And if GW is supposed to melt the ice, why does it come back now?

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.